The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given maps depict how Grange Park looks like today compared to itself in 1920
Generally, there have been significant rearrangements taken place in the park over almost a century, and new entertainment facilities can be found at every corner of today's park.
In 1920, there were two entrances situated on Eldon Street and Arnold Avenue respectively. Today, the two gates still remain but there is another one constructed in the underground car park right next to the newly constructed water feature which was formerly a Glasshouse. Previously, there were three Rose gardens in the park. However, two of them were taken down and a larger one was built right at the heart of the park in replacement of the fountain. The former Rose Garden and the pond for water plants were substituted by a new children's play area and a café which are shown in the second illustration. Another obvious change occurred was the destruction of the Stage for musician to give way to the amphitheatre for concerts. The seats were relocated to be around the rose garden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- Today TV channels provide man s sport shows more than women s sport shows why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, second, still, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91061452514 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75922234501 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625698324022 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2685557907 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138302703494 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554331480368 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561244871116 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111383200036 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231403501405 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.