The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps compare the changes of a public park built in 1920 and still open today. According to the plans, we can see the stage for musicians had changed to amphitheatre for concerts, which was located in the left of the plan. Moreover, the number of the Rose gardon where located in the three corner move in the center of the park, which replace the fountain. Also, the four seats around the rose garden instead in the left of the park. It is clear that one of the rose garden where beside the entrance, in the past, had replace by the cafe now. Besides the cafe, children's play area has built in today, which was the pond for water plants in the past. The glasshouse had changed from water feature where located in the corner of the right below. And the entrance underground car park is built in today which was not appear in the past. In summary, the facilities in the park has changed and built from 1920 to today, including amphitheatre for concerts, cafe, children's are play area, water feature and entrance underground car park. However, the entrance of the park never change.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with family and friends Why does this happen What are the effects of this on family life and society as a whole 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 67
- Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors to take part in major competitions such as Olympic Games or football World Cup Some people say that it would be better to spend this money encouraging children to take up sports from a young age To 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...e beside the entrance, in the past, had replace by the cafe now. Besides the cafe, chil...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...e beside the entrance, in the past, had replace by the cafe now. Besides the cafe, chil...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 822, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'appeared'.
Suggestion: appeared
...ar park is built in today which was not appear in the past. In summary, the facilities...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, moreover, so, still, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54591836735 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24356987617 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479591836735 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5399797673 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210334443782 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966671951627 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626431182864 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210334443782 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.