Some people prefer to take small classes in which the professor can remember every student’s name. Other people think it is better to take big classes. Which do you prefer and why?
Students obtain several choices to take lecturers in their school. While some people adore selecting small sessions where the lecturer can remind every student’s name, others prefer to take big classes. It is so controvertible for them to determine a specific conclusion. In my view, students should attend small classes in their school life. They concentrate on the lecture compared with large classes, easily talk with the professor, and join in classes by active.
To begin with, choosing small classes produces concentration into a student’s attitude. In a big class, people often worry about noise by people who talk with their friends because it is not enough for the professor to take care of classes. Therefore, the students who want to listen carefully about contexts of lecture fail to attain credits of these courses. On the other hand, if they decide to attend a small one, they do not need to be anxious about other people. Thus, they are capable of focusing on the classes compared to big ones.
Secondly, young people gain bountiful conversations with their instructors in small sessions. It is so significant for them to contact professors because they have to keep their grades and capacities of knowledge for their future. After they establish appointments for inquiries about the lecturers, their possibility of wisdom gradually boosts by communication with their professors face to face. If they select a big class, the lecturer does not provide their students with plenty of meetings. They do not remain the time to make conversations by considering classes’ materials, grading past tests, and attending conferences about education.
Finally, students become an active person to pick a small class for their school life. People who participate in a big class only earn note-taking and listen to what the professors speak. It is so difficult for them to be more active in a lecture because there are so many people in the classroom. Nevertheless, in a small one, people are approximately ten people, so they easily discuss the materials of the lecture with their classmates and exploit class activities for a profound comprehension.
To sum up, young people should participate in a small class. I surely believe that they focus on it compared with a big one, create enough discussions with the educator, and evolve to be an aggressive person in the class.
- Revised Now many people believe that primary school students should spend more time on learning technical subjects such as computer instead of arts or music Do you think it is a good or bad decision 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For a business to be successful man must spend a lot of money on advertising 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is difficult for teachers to be both popular liked by students and effective in helping students in learning 73
- Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the course 1 Some professors who are voted to be the most popular 2 some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parent should limit the hours that children spend on digital products besides schoolwork 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15424164524 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84610550501 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496143958869 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3514897541 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4761904762 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294305166891 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107711968381 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863888301749 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196620136064 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729356227402 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.