The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and plans also give a description of proposed changes. Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the transformation in a particular area between 1965 and now. Simultaneously, these diagrams also make a production of these changes in the future.
One of the first things to note is that there are two bridges which have been built across the River Tam over the period from 1965 to the present day.
According to the diagrams, to the northwest of this area, the trees have been cut down to make way for the car park. Moreover, there was a small change in the size of the city which was opposite the area of trees.
As can be seen from the maps, to the northeast of the ashore area, there were many houses in here in 1965. This area of houses has been expanded that means more houses have been built. Furthermore, in the centre of the area of the houses, a car park has been constructed. Another thing to add is that there was also a car park erected near the footbridge. Finally, it is expected that there will have another car park located outside this area in 2018.
Overall, this area witnessed a dramatic change throughout the period shown.
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities such as the environment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books What is your opinion 61
- Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 84
- The diagram below shows the process of manufacturing ceramic pots 67
- Nowadays media should include more good news in their publications Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, moreover, so, another thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52577319588 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43298969072 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.956073697 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8181818182 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172049405532 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696621380691 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356131009704 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107109204553 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354000114932 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.