Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities.
Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent times, a clan of masses believe that exchanging cultural contacts between nations is not fruitful for their national legacies. While, I believe that this trend has numerous benefits and is always adequate for countries. This essay will not only describe the reasons behind the trend but my opinion also will be conclude with examples.
On the one hand, the prime reason is narrow minded nature of the elderlies. Because of this, such dominating nature does not allow them to share their virtues of their imperative culture. Consequently, they have a xenophobia of losing their culture. Therefore, they are not feel comfortable with accepting other tradition values. For example, since last decades many Indian villages people do not allow their young ones to meet other foreign tourist as they have fear of losing their traditional virtues.
On the other hand, the vast majority of people believe that with proliferating in sharing border with other countries, they can invite a big crowd to visit their place. Besides this, they can earn a big amount of revenue and also can give work opportunities to the local one. Ultimately, it would help a nation to improve its economic growth and create a stand to come in developed nations. For instance, it was published in one of the magazine that the economy of all heritage locations in India has been improving since last five years because the government had arranged wider facilities to visit such locations.
In conclusion, although, visiting other countries by different people have a few drawbacks, its positive influence cannot be neglected. The government should generate more option that attracts more tourists as it is extremely helpful to sustain the economic growth as well as communities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-21 | Saumilshah62802@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | azhar46 | 79 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: COMFORTABLE_WITH_VBG[1]
Message: Use simply 'comfortable accepting'.
Suggestion: comfortable accepting
...r culture. Therefore, they are not feel comfortable with accepting other tradition values. For example, si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65872479698 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7578015318 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123089917498 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040424955988 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380282145618 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731783290359 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247799576262 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.