The bar chart below depict the proportion of English and Welsh families in possessed and leased accommodations during 1918 to 2011. Overall, it is noticeable that owned and rented housings show an opposite trend.
Looking at the chart at more detail, in 1918 leased accommodations stood at approximately 78%, while possessed housings was about 23%. In 1939, percentage of rented housings started to decrease to around 68%, while proportion of owned accommodations began to increase to approximately 32%. After that, in 1953, both possessed and leased housings remained constant, before both continued to show opposite trend in 1961, where owned housings was approximately 41% and rented housings was about 59%. Furthermore, in 1971 both owned and rented stood at the same number, at 50%.
After that, a reversal happens to possessed and leased housings, where from 1981 to 2001 the percentage of owned accommodations exceeded leased housings' percentage. In 1981, bought housings was 60%, where leased housings was only 40%. The trend continued until 2001, where owned housings stood at approximately 69% and leased accommodations stood at about 31%. After that, in 2011, owned accommodation dropped slightly to about 65% while leased accommodation rose slightly to around 38%.
- the chart below show the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 80
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4797979798 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97019940091 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474747474747 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7191601092 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175539509722 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918124060396 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363502312927 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154194807472 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413192136287 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.