56. The graph below show the percentage of math graduate and all gradutates who got full time job after graduating from a university in Australia,and also show the average salary of both these types of graduates
The two types of chart provides the proportion of students who possessed full time careers after graduation and the average incomes of them in an Australian tertiary school in the period of 8 years, which began in 2004.
Overall, it is clear the figures in all 2 groups of graduates experienced a downward trend during the whole period. Moreover, students received higher average salaries in 2012 compared to 2004.
According to the line chart, there were about 80% of Math graduates successfully found their full time careers in 2004. However, after reaching a peak of 90% in 2006, a steady decline was seen in this figure during the last 6-year period , accounting for only 78% in 2012. Likewise, while the proportion of students taking part in full time jobs witnessed a remarkable increase by nearly 20% in the first 8 years, the significant decrease by more than 10% was happened in the remaining period.
Referring to the table, the salaries of math students graduating from Australian college rose steadily from 41000 dollars in 2004 to 56000 dollars in 2012.However, making up of the same amount of money in 2004, the incomes of all graduates in the school increased in a lower rate than that of Math students, accounting for 51000 dollars in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-05 | nguyen.buituan | 46 | view |
| 2021-04-05 | nguyen.buituan | 72 | view |
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clear up the pollution they produced the government should not pay for it To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Why are young people leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities Do the advantages outweight the disadvantage 84
- Employer should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialize with people in their local communities Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantage 89
- In some culture old people are valued more while in other cultures youth is considered more valuable Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...Math graduates successfully found their full time careers in 2004. However, after reachin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...his figure during the last 6-year period , accounting for only 78% in 2012. Likewi...
^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...e proportion of students taking part in full time jobs witnessed a remarkable increase by...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ollars in 2004 to 56000 dollars in 2012.However, making up of the same amount of money ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93785310734 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65503977514 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649717514124 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.4391691871 43.030603864 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.666666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191169499117 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089553863322 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540091256126 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127496814858 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137794792084 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.