Rates of smoking in Someland.
A report on a thousand Someland natives, illustrated in the form of a line graph reveals data on the rate by which men and women smoke over four decades.
Generally speaking, the rate by which men smoke plummeted towards the end of the 2000. However, the same cannot be said about women, as it augmented till 1977 after which it remained constant for about five years and later on significantly dropped.
A specific analysis reveals that women in Someland recorded a constant smoking rate in the years 1966-71 and 1977-82. Women also demonstrated the lowest rate in 1960. By 2000, only two hundred women in every thousand people were smoking in Someland.
In 1960, men displayed the highest rate of smoking, with almost six hundred people smoking in the nation. Unlike women, the rate by which men smoked gradually decreased. On a final note, difference between men and women declined by the end of the decade.
- In the past few years Fern Valley University has suffered from a decline in both enrollments and admissions applications The reason can be discovered from our students who most often cite poor teaching and inadequate library resources as their chief sourc 60
- The table below shows how the UK unemployed spent their time last year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and more mysterious 50
- Some people feel that boarding schools are an excellent option for children while other people disagree for many reasons Consider both sides of this debate and conclude 61
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85897435897 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49483358339 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0445540483 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2222222222 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40453972813 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191837062846 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116930267112 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265447913432 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103041926974 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.