The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
The top diagram represents the 2007 view of the way to the city hospital, and directly below the subsequent 2010 map that illustrates the growth and expansion around the city hospital. This report will highlight the similarities and differences.
As an initial overview, both the views present common elements, although in different measures. These include bus station and car park. Noticeably newly planned changes include a roundabout and public car park.
The 2007 map reveals that the city hospital has only one exit/entrance which is through the car park: public and staff. However, the 2010 plan depicts that the hospital provided two car parks, one for the staff and the other for the public. Entrance/exit is available through both the car park spaces. The bus station underwent a drastic change in three years, in the beginning it was located on the east and west side of the hospital road but in 2010 the size of the bus station nearly tripled itself and was positioned to the west of the hospital road while connecting it to the two roundabouts.
Another addition made to the roads connecting the city hospital was the implementation of roundabouts. First roundabout connects the city road, hospital road and bus station and thus providing seamless movement of traffic. While the second one binds the Ring road, hospital road and bus station. On a final note, the ring road around the hospital was only altered to provide another entrance other than that it pretty much remained the same.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-24 | nvtrung309 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Hồ Phi Long | 10 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | hankhinhduong | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | albertonian | 84 | view |
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- Rates of smoking in Someland 78
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
- The table below shows how the UK unemployed spent their time last year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 26.3917525773 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 937.175257732 134% => OK
No of words: 250.0 206.0 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.78020617076 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62828004596 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 127.690721649 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 290.88556701 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4704418305 44.8134815571 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5384615385 76.5299724578 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 4.34317383033 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.94845360825 253% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32662210641 0.216113520407 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105661724554 0.0766984524023 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912713044409 0.0603063233224 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176406650007 0.12726935374 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102616839427 0.0580467560999 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 41.2886597938 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.