Being stuck among technology gears and adapting the speed of life based on them are becoming an endless process among human beings. Of course, technological advancement owe its high speed wheels movements on science but the paramount role of history should be considered beside them. Therefore, subjects like technology and science are not mutually exclusive with history and I will explain why.
On the one hand, advocates of educating future generation in fields of science and technology may have worries about their upcoming job opportunities. For example, organizations and companies are trying to appoint people who have special qualified skills in computer science, meaning most of the businesses are based on working with computers. As computers are becoming more paramount in workplaces ranging from a client work, an accountant, programming staff to executives, familiarity with it is compulsory. Furthermore, proponents believe that subjects like science and technology if are educated from the beginning of school time, can develop pupils mind and make them more creative. They say that spending time on peripheral subjects like history can waste their time and spoil their future job opportunities because it does not play an important role in nurturing their necessary skills in occupying jobs.
On the other hand, opponents think that history is an inseparable part of any society because it enriches people’s life. It means, knowing about how ancestors saved territories and did self-sacrifices to rescue them make a sense of pride and increase society member’s patriotic sense that are necessary in terms of the lessons learned, with awareness of how being important to preserve the territory in probable future invasion. Besides, some children find history intriguing and want to choose it as their field of study. Then, forcing students only for limited subjects can not be reasonable for whom are fond of history, meaning we should let them choose their field of studies based on their interests rather than forcing them.
To conclude, I tend to side with the opponents of considering history beside other school curriculums because it is a part of our identification and play an important role in our life.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 42
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...separable part of any society because it enriches people’s life. It means, knowin...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with awareness of how being important to preserve the territory in probable futur...
^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mited subjects can not be reasonable for whom are fond of history, meaning we sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37215909091 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86738655729 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4756609243 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.461538462 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242580346333 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872471657301 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550247423259 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141472111143 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262838359872 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.