In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
In the era of digitalization, when everything from banking transactions to critical data is securely managed in a handy digital system, the world can be tracked easily through the internet flooded with global information. Although the school of thought is that modern society relies mainly upon internet services to explore the world and will completely switch to it in the future, however, the real fun of knowing the globe while having a break from technology through a hard copy can not be ignored. So, I partially agree with the given statement and think that each aspect has its own benefits.
The first justification in the favor of the latest gadgets displaying worldly status lies in comfortable handling. Also, it takes an initiative to save our environment by creating a paperless community. In addition, the pleasure to enjoy the e-book facility and visual approach provide an extra edge on online surfing. However, nothing comes for free. For example, to acquire an advertisement free telecast, one has to upgrade the channel subscriptions.
Turning to the other aspect, it is an irrefutable fact that printed materials are losing importance in the advent of technology. As many people still believe in the gains it can have as a whole. First of all, overexposure to technical devices can badly impact our mental and physical health. For instance, various studies reveal that the majority of people are getting eye issues due to the overuse of technology. Also, for managing a work-life balance one needs to be away from the chasing internet world so that to connect with the real world.
To conclude, it is an undeniable fact that online platforms have become an indispensable part of our burgeoning economy. The views on the diminishing approach towards reading books and newspapers in the favor of emerging digital resources varies largely. However, in my opinion, a balanced approach between traditional and modern styles is highly synonymous with the betterment of society.
- 92
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 74
- The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20433436533 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86338044278 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613003095975 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5343362254 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100072388769 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274857483453 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291850669732 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565590860832 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303388700772 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.