Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one?
Mobile phones are being widely used by kids over the globe these days.
While these devices can play a role in connectedness and safety, many schools have restricted the access of these devices on campus.
In my view, this is a positive development and I believe that this change can make a positive impact on children's academic as well as physical life.
Firstly, restrictions on mobile phones in the classroom itself can improve concentration while learning.
This is simply because, if there are no sounds of notification beeps or typing on mobile phones, students can concentrate fully on what teachers are teaching.
For instance, if there is a continuous sound of notification pop-ups then children can't control their urge to check notification updates or any social media updates.
As a result, they fail to pay full attention to learning. This can have a long term impact on their academics.
So, banning phones in the classroom is a positive development.
Lastly, the ban on the use of phones on campus can improve children's physical development. The reason for this is that, if phones are not banned on campus then children will be busy with their phones, instead of playing on the ground with their friends. For example, many children can be seen from a school where mobile phones are allowed, playing online games in recess time instead of playing on the ground. Because of that, they cannot fully evolve physically.
Hence, it is a positive sign to ban the use of phones in school.
To conclude, despite phones are part of modern lives, I strongly feel that their use should be restricted in order to grow children academically as well as physically.
- In order to improve a country’s education system, youngstudents should be allowed to openly criticize their teachersduring class time. Do you agree with this? What are some otherways education systems could be improved? 84
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet.What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved? 61
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 68
- People should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...d of notification pop-ups then children cant control their urge to check notificatio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98576512456 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70517881602 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53024911032 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5374815094 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.38176352705 251% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298511673191 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106840391585 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740078848016 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129514657253 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690089106232 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.