In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?
For centuries, people grew up hearing many inspirational stories of personalities who have achieved higher status by putting diligent efforts in their respective fields. It is often believed that children can be instigated to reach their goals if they are being taught to work hard, while many others oppose this ingrained fallacy. This essay would endeavor to shed some light on various shortcomings and benefits that this popular belief can have on our society.
To begin with, it is an undeniable fact that each parent is always aspiring to see the best in their child, so they prefer to transfer their success mantras to them. Despite turning them into a responsible and hard-working individual, these learning are synonymous with the future prospects that prompt them to chase their dreams. For example, it is usually seen that children with ethical learnings are always unstoppable in their goals.
In contrast, the adverse bearings of these fallacious thoughts on the holistic development of our generation can not be overlooked. Due to the pressure of our ingrained expectations, many children soon lose their interest in studies. Moreover, they fail to develop an experimental and exploratory approach towards learning which is highly needed in today's competitive and technical world. In addition, the impact on growing years, both at a physical and mental level can not be ignored. For instance, studies have shown that children develop stress syndromes at an early age due to increased pressure.
To conclude, the school of thought that hard work is the key to success is highly prevalent in our society. However, as their well-wishers, we should be flexible in our approach and allow them to explore their world while sharing values of integrity, and hard work. We should never forget that smart children are needed to run this innovative world.
- The chart describes the amount spent on consumer goods in sterling pounds by the given list of countries on different goods
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 91
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23666666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7476757855 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7743685546 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177781394379 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617155847526 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495712992276 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108804880138 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052167323399 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.