The given line graph compares the number of people who visited two new musical sites on the internet over a period of 15 days.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a few fluctuations, the pop parade led the entire chart.
According to the given illustration, the pop parade started with 120k visitors, exactly three times higher compared to the music choice. Whilst the figure for the former remained nearly the same for three consecutive days in a row before witnessing a sharp plunge to below 40k on the 7th day, the latter underwent an erratic pattern prior to attaining a value 50% of the former site.
Further, between the 7th and 9th day, the pop site observed numbers ranging between 30k to 40k, which were closely followed by the other site at a difference of nearly 10k. Further, the 9th day onwards, the pop site rose dramatically up by four-fold against only 20k mucic choice visitors. However, by the next day, the music choice at 120k surpassed the pop site by 40k. But, in the end, the pattern overrode by the pop site, as it rose to 170k visitors, just double of the music choice visitors.
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in this one person households 89
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 84
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages 80
- Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person Do you think this is the best way to do it or are there better alternatives What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75124378109 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46803279187 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616915422886 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8748297 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240231701129 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113274848851 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134358577586 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16419408366 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174521698391 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.