Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world where we are living now is fast than before. To get the anchor and play vital role is the core issue. Many factors are motivating to get the fruit of success such as discreetness, patience, fast but effective approach and more importantly optimism. Working fast often lays more errors than doing work slowly is the given excerpt-with this someone would agree, others would not. In my opinion, working slowly is rather provides many benefits for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that we know the proverb, 'slow and steady wins the race". Being slow does not mean not working, but it means to take time for better planning for the upcoming events. Successful people are abide by to follow that principle and became an exemplary instance to us. For example, a few days while I was scrolling in a YouTube I found a videos regarding the title lose but not give up. In this video, many athletes early career were describing such as, Bolt, Michael Phelps and also the best talk show presenter Oprah Winfrey. All of their unsuccessful during the time they were just started their career. After consecutive failure, they did not give up rather they schemed a long plan to practice their work in an arduous fashion. And now, they became a part of our world history. As you can see that, failure does not mean to an end but it provides many routes to do the same work and that has been well illustrated from the eminent person life.
Another reason is that great discovery and invention came to us in a discrete fashion because of inventor or discoverer long time efforts. In any area of sciences from technology to medical the advantages we are now enjoying is improving step by step. For instance, when I was in my school life, I heard about Tomas Edison who was famous for the discovery of electric bulbs. By searching about him online I learnt that, he was attempting thousand time to invent this bulb. He was tired but he did not give up. And finally, he got success. This experience taught me that, our improvement were came from these peoples sweating and it also goads us to take a long term approach for our own life problems.
In sum, slow and discreet approach would not convincing for a person who likes rush and take risk but in long run their frenetic approach will be existed. Being calm and considerable in working not only drive us toward success but also motivates us to follow. For this reason, we should take time before working as it derive long term benefits.
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 66
- As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist 68
- 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a video' or simply 'videos'?
Suggestion: a video; videos
...le I was scrolling in a YouTube I found a videos regarding the title lose but not give u...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an arduous fashion" with adverb for "arduous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...emed a long plan to practice their work in an arduous fashion. And now, they became a part of our wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a discrete fashion" with adverb for "discrete"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...reat discovery and invention came to us in a discrete fashion because of inventor or discoverer long ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...online I learnt that, he was attempting thousand time to invent this bulb. He was tired ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...ce taught me that, our improvement were came from these peoples sweating and it also...
^^^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'convince'
Suggestion: convince
...m, slow and discreet approach would not convincing for a person who likes rush and take ri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'derives'?
Suggestion: derives
...e should take time before working as it derive long term benefits.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, regarding, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6606741573 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4068349419 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56404494382 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.378392901 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4166666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5416666667 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.20833333333 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128267033619 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365555694877 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511058694063 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915629775292 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753693461759 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.