Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

Essay topics:

Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

College and university plays very important role in country's development by building a good and intellectuals nation. According to the author statement, faculties of college and universities should require outside training is good and relevant. Contrasting with my opinion, it will not fulfill the essence of the learning rather it will devoid students and their expertness will also unattainable.

Firstly, in the name of outside training, it is mere waste of time and faculties concentrate their economic fulfillment by providing teaching outside universities. For instance, in Bangladesh, most of the university professors take study leave and they engaged to teach various private universities to get a huge sum of money in the short time and the university, where they were actually served is neglected from their greedy choice.

Secondly, most of the time, the training motto is not attained because of teachers lacks of concentration and limited knowledge. For instance, from Bangladesh every year a huge number of teachers go abroad university in the name of teaching and their expertness development. And a recent study has been published by a country's well known newspaper, says most of teachers have faced many types of barrier such as, language, cultural, lack of relevant course knowledge. As a result, they are wasting government money and also they deprived their students.

Thirdly, outside to their university course work is devoid their respective university from research development and country faces many problems for that. For example, a biology teacher, who is working on human genome project and recently university administration announced that he needs training on other topics and he left his research work incomplete. As a result, the outcome of his research is on peril and the students on his group also devoid of research development.

However, one would argue that, outside course increasing teachers expertness by learning a new area of knowledge but the statement is limited and nugatory in comparison with widespread phenomena.

In conclusion, from wasting time to research peril, in the name of outside training is not a pragmatic choice for teachers expertness and development rather it will create many futile scenarios that ultimately harm country's teaching and prosperity. Then, in the name of outside training is should be pragmatically managed for the sake of education and society good.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-02 tedyang777 50 view
2022-09-26 Danbrilliant 58 view
2022-09-25 Danbrilliant 62 view
2022-01-23 Afia Ibnath 62 view
2022-01-23 Afia Ibnath 16 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user sajib :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teachers') or simply say ''most teachers''.
Suggestion: most of the teachers; most teachers
...y a countrys well known newspaper, says most of teachers have faced many types of barrier such a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...d argue that, outside course increasing teachers expertness by learning a new area of kn...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 288, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
.... Then, in the name of outside training is should be pragmatically managed for the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47757255937 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97874575176 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511873350923 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8606948296 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.4 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 5.21951772744 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250542116005 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08796149312 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673032377407 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124330513472 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487799905256 0.0667264976115 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.