Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The prompt focuses on requiring faculty members to obtain practical experience for the course they teach without truly giving us a reason why it suggest so. Despite this omission, I strongly agree with the prompt for the impact it has on the development of faculty skills and the ability to foster more synergy between academics and industry, something that has shaped the revolution of the world. However, I concede that doing so may have some negative consequences. One, if not the most deleterious would be the loss of classroom time that could create a knowledge chasm between students; Those that enjoyed more touchpoints with their faculty and those that do not, breeding disparity in academic knowledge bases and hamper innovation.
To start with the enhancement of faculty skills, the industry has shown remarkable ability to deliver innovation on its own. From the creation of what has been dubbed the R&D department. A term used for research and development. Organizations are beginning to focus on inhouse creativity and groundbreaking innovations. This was unthinkable centuries ago, when the likes of Sir Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday and James Watts discovered a lot of new inventions that drove revolutions. The later for example, Watt, found the steam engine - A propeller of the fourth industrial revolution, which changed lives and is credited with so many technological advancement we enjoyed today. Bringing back this synergy requires a conscious effort and one of the best ways is to allow academic access companies in their area of interest. Another advantage of this approach will be the funding benefit for research that could be crucial in spurring research within the academic faculty. An important cog of colleges and universities mandate that has suffered drastically from dearth of funding as companies began to feel detached from academics.
From a perspective of playing the devil's advocate, one could argue that requiring our university teachers to obtain non-academic experience will lead to some negative impact on students. For a fact, different faculty have different strengths and we may see the impact of their absence on the student. Imagine, a highly skilled professor at inspiring his student think critically and innovatively leaving the classroom for a while, we might lose out on developing more individuals who can challenge the status-quo or have certain skills that can contribute to societal advancement. We can however curb this impact by insisting the experience should be done simultaneously rather than in isolation to one another. Another way to curb this will be to embed the industrial training requirement to the classroom in such a way that both the teacher and student undergo the process together. This will build a stronger linkage to both parties and also to the industry by utilizing theories learnt in the classroom to tackle practical problems and learning what new innovations and approach are being adopted by companies.
Overall, it is very vital to allow faculty experience practical knowledge of their field beyond the classroom, albeit with enough planning for the negative effects including allowing students to come along and supporting them during their time away to keep in touch with developments in the academic world during this period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 83 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | tedyang777 | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Danbrilliant | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Danbrilliant | 62 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | Afia Ibnath | 62 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 83
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 83
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...y it suggest so. Despite this omission, I strongly agree with the prompt for the ...
^
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...d the revolution of the world. However, I concede that doing so may have some neg...
^
Line 2, column 688, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'backs'.
Suggestion: backs
... advancement we enjoyed today. Bringing back this synergy requires a conscious effor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, for example, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2792.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30798479087 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88122656824 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56463878327 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 865.8 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5781727145 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.6 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13127174044 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380045345147 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372494159903 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843769736892 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321723884188 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.