A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The concept of national curriculum can enable countries acheive certain objectives which include providing a similar foundation for all students in terms of knowledge and areas of common national interest such as its history, languages and customs. What percentage of a country's citizens would set aside time to know its history without a policy mandating them to? The idea of a national curriculum helps to make this possible by providing a platform for discussions centered around history and help individuals imbibe the culture of patriotism. A curriculum imbibed with history for example - can inspire individuals to greater heights from past heroes and event that has shaped the country's history. Take Singapore as a country for instance, the strides and efforts of Lee Kuan Yew has not only inspired singaporeans or shaped its developmental trajectory but also non-singaporeans like me who have been motivated by his legacies. There are also a plethora of individuals such as Mandela, the "Dalai Lama" and others who have gone on to become idols for so many individuals around the globe from the inclusion of such studies in national curriculum.
Moreover, a national curriculum can be used to achieve some minimal level of knowledge for all students which would be highly impossible in a bespoke curriculum environment: Communication and financial literacy skills are life essentials and mandating students to therefore go through a course that entails these skills as a minimum can provide valuable information even if individuals can act irrationally at their own discretion. Akin to that, a curriculum that imbibes activities such as sports can help student cultivate a lifestyle of exercise which is an imperative towards a healthy lifestyle.
Also, a national curriculum can help to curtail the bias of parents and guardian who are most likely to influence the decisions of students before they enter college. As humans, we are bias monsters with great desire for control especially when it comes to our children. Parents more often than not, already have a desired career path for their children and may only concentrate on skills and knowledge needed for the career path without an external force compelling the children to go through some other form of knowledge which they may ultimately prefer. The benefits here are to provide a balance approach towards a students experience and knowledge until they are able to decide what interests they have and also what motivates them.
Overall, a national curriculum that is well thought out and considers factors such as skills needed in all realms of careers, social skills and health related consideration would provide an ameliorating impact on individual and parental biases, greed and as a minimum improve individuals knowledge of their heritage even if it doesn't spur their interest in their country's development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 83
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to provide a balance approach towards a students experience and knowledge until they are...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... knowledge of their heritage even if it doesnt spur their interest in their countrys d...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32532751092 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92537512843 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548034934498 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.7820714373 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.615384615 118.986275619 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2307692308 23.4991977007 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229254764374 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086539257162 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691593929512 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133815181795 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354914143963 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 14.1392134831 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 48.8420337079 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.