In modern scenario, unprecedented technological advancements have modernized the present generation. People least bother about recycling and composting the wastage. Numerous individuals consider that governments should frame some stringent laws concerning to empower recycling. According to my perception, society and the administration need to collaborate to promote the phenomenon of recycling.
Commencing the discussion, nowadays, people least bother about the significance of recycling and negligently make their surroundings look squalid and insalubrious. Noticeable cause behind the menace is lack of awareness concerning the imminence of recycling. Comprehensibly, more awareness campaigns should be conducted by the government in order to acquaint the masses with the benefits of recycling the utilised products. Moreover, rewards and recognition must be announced to boost the recycling process. Apart from this, common public need to apprehend their social responsibilities towards the maintenance of cleanliness and hygiene.
Further elucidating my perspective, stringent rules and regulations should be imposed by the local administrations to reinforce the recycling process. Also, strict action should be taken against anyone who violates the norms concerning the disposition. Moreover, renowned politicians and celebrities demonstrate cleanliness and recycling. For instance, Prime Minister, Narinder Modi conducted aware campaign 'Swachh Bharat Abhiyan' to create awareness amongst the present generation to maintain cleanliness and segregate recycling items to maintain the ecological balance of nature.
To recapitulate, recycling plays an indispensable role in maintaining the cleanliness and hygiene. Governments as well as intellectual individuals need to work in collaboration to inspire the people to reinforce the reprocessing the used items. Moreover, adequate vending machines should be installed by the administration to ease the public endeavours.
- Nowadays some buildings such as offices and schools have open space design instead of separate rooms Why is it so Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- In many countries today the eating habits and lifestyle of children are different from those of previous generations Some people say this has had a negative effect on their health To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for 78
- Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones in school To what extent do yoy agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'People the least'.
Suggestion: People the least
...have modernized the present generation. People least bother about recycling and composting t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'people the least'.
Suggestion: people the least
... Commencing the discussion, nowadays, people least bother about the significance of recycl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ntenance of cleanliness and hygiene. Further elucidating my perspective, stringent r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, well, apart from, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.44943820225 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44188439583 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7959608545 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203298037733 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626672356839 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561261766113 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124902729217 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501514493831 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.3 11.3001002004 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.83 12.4159519038 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.