The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world
The given pie charts detail the statistical surveyed information revealing the proportional usage of water in San Diego and California compared to the entire world's water distribution for mainly three purposes( residential, industrial, and agricultural).
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of water in San Diego and California is used for residential purposes followed next by the industrial sector. However, with a reverse trend, the world's predominant sector order is agriculture, industry, and residential.
According to the given illustration, nearly 3 in every 5 units of water is diverted to the residential areas in San Diego as compared to just below 40% in California. However, of the total water, nearly 11% fewer units are invested in the industry in San Diego, while 28% is utilized for the same in California. Although the respective proportions varied largely, both the countries followed a similar sectorial trend in water usage.
In contrast, the share of water at the world's level in agriculture accounts for 69%, twice the industrial requirements in California, and just 9% below as used in San Diego for the residential areas. Moving on, whilst about 23% of the world's water is directed in the industrial sector, nearly one-third of the that goes for residential needs.
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Art is considered an important part of society as well as an expression of a culture Do you think it s important for children to be taught art Do you think students should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects 89
- The chart below gives information about trends in internet use by females in the USA in two years 92
- The chart below shows the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles traveled PMT by transportation type in 2002 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37440758294 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07272789981 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554502369668 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7276728743 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.75 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419241396258 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181241447705 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121564763091 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265453857224 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983697270262 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.