The diagrams below show two methods of collecting water for irrigation purposes.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features ad make comparisons where relevant
The diagrams show the ways people collect water from wells to irrigation channels and from these channels to fields for farming.
The diagram B shows how to get water from wells to irrigation channels. First, a system of pulley, rollers and ropes is placed at the top of the well which has a depth of 50 meters . After that, a bucket in which water is hold are tied with the tail of the ropes. Finally, a cow is fastened with the heads of the ropes. The process begins when the cow comes near the well so the length of the rope inside the well gets longer. Hence, the bucket can fall down far enough to let water go inside it. When the cow walks down on the slope, the bucket is pulled up to the top of the well and water is poured into the irrigation channels.
The diagram A shows how to collect water from irrigation channels to fields. This task is completed with a simple system built with a basket made of bamboo or leather and 4 ropes. These ropes are tied with the sides of the basket: 2 ropes in a side and 2 others in the opposite side. There are 2 people standing next to a 1-2 metres depth irrigation channel. Each of them hold 2 ropes connected with the basket. Next, they throw the basket into the channel to get the water. Finally, the basket is pulled up and moved towards to the fields to force water inside it to come out.
Overall, these diagrams show highly intelligent methods that people in rural area use to tackle the collecting water problem for irrigation purposes without motorized equipments
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-21 | Efuli | view | |
| 2022-08-10 | becky123bts | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | Musashi | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | Ly8 | 84 | view |
- The diagrams below show two methods of collecting water for irrigation purposes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features ad make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show two methods of collecting water for irrigation purposes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features ad make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the well which has a depth of 50 meters . After that, a bucket in which water is ...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A show' or simply 'shows'?
Suggestion: A show; Shows
...the irrigation channels. The diagram A shows how to collect water from irrigation ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...igent methods that people in rural area use to tackle the collecting water problem ...
^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on purposes without motorized equipments
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42553191489 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19800483664 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485815602837 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2455786698 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9375 5.23603664747 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173381077511 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664569920026 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829635425857 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144295156092 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065229046459 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.