This chart tries to introduce different places where the internet is surfing by humanity during five years.
This chart tries to introduce different places where the internet is surfing by humanity during five years.
Overall, the most probable information is that, library is less than other sites, but a downside of this place is home. Another obvious information is that, whole spots are illustrated lower percentages, except home.
Home peaked at 55%in the first year, and then it modestly decreased. From 2000 to 2002,it exhibited about 50%.However at the last year home displayed the similar percentage, with the first year. Work is successively went down first three periods, but became to the last year, it sharply declined.
It is important to take into consideration that, people have to study at college and read books in library, as a result of it, social nets are used below 20 percent. In the first two periods, college indicated the same percentage. In 2002,it dramatically climbed to 25%,but in 2004,college sharply dropped and revealed low percentage than previous two years. If library stood around 12%,it gradually soars and dips. An additional information, which we can see in this diagram is, the similarity of three periods in the last place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-12 | EnglishUSA_uz | 78 | view |
- The maintenance of public libraries is a waste of money because of computer technologies that have the same function 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation 56
- the graph below shows the changes in the places where people used to surf the Internet in the years 1998 2002 and 2004 73
- The graph below shows the number of passangers rail journeys made in great britain between 1950 and 2004 5 78
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 ang 1990 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...rom 2000 to 2002,it exhibited about 50%.However at the last year home displayed the sim...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rom 2000 to 2002,it exhibited about 50%.However at the last year home displayed the sim...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17553191489 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73829766569 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68085106383 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5965481767 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260651453692 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106945294696 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.239860866399 0.0843802449381 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255394043895 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.348651966122 0.0819641961636 425% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.