The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sport activities by youngest and oldest populations, in US, in 2015
The bar graph compares the time spent per day in recreation and sports by young generation and seniors in United States in 2015.
In overall, it is clear that while people aged over 75 inclined to watch television the most, playing electronical games was the most popular type of recreational activity in kids.
According to the bar chart, while seniors dominated the first place in term of watching tv, with 4,5 hours per day, the number of the 15-19 age group only accounted for 2,4 hours. In contrast, students spent an average of 1 hour playing computer games when they had leisure time. However, this rate was only 0,5 when it came to the over 75 age group.
The trend was totally different when it came to other sectors. The avegare hours which older group allocated to read and relax were more than those in younger people, at 1 hour and 6 minutes each compared to 2 minutes and 1 minute. In term of socialization and sporting competitions, the children’s figure was more significant than that in elderly, by 1 minute and 4 minutes respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-13 | quynhnhi280103 | 90 | view |
- The gap between the rich and poor is becoming wider the rich are getting richer the poor even more poorer What problems can the situation cause and suggest solutions 89
- 49 The chart below shows the spending in million by 18 20 year olds in one country on five different products in 2010 and 2014 70
- It is becoming increasingly expensive to keep museums open to the public What do you think is the best way of funding them 11
- 33 The following charts illustrate the information about players of electronic games in South Korea in 2003 70
- Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72972972973 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62196152714 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637837837838 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1608237303 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180398710788 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723576795811 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069065872854 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106846700683 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699649417519 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.