The most effective way to solve the current traffic and pollution problems in cities is to encourage people to move from the suburbs or countryside into the city Centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern era, where most of the individuals have had possibilities to buy their own vehicles, both traffic and pollution have got controversial difficulties. Some people argue that one practical way to diminish those issues has been to stimulate residents to live in inner cities. I myself totally disagree with this statement regarding to some significant reasons which will be clarified in this essay.
To commence with, encouraging individuals to move into city Centre has propelled to create huge issues. The main one is that overcrowding in the cities has led to have more traffic congestion because of particular capacities for population in cities. Therefore, if the number of residents crossed the crossing line, they would have problems in order to handle high proportion of vehicles in their streets. As a result, in rush hour where many employees have finished their work and wanted to go to their houses, metropolitan cities such as Tehran, which is the capital of Iran, has had unbelievably horrible traffic jams.
In addition, the more traffic is produced, the more contamination will release. That is because of the fact which the key source of air pollution has been discovered to the spread gases by the wagons. Consequently, the most polluted cities in the world have been the ones which have been overcrowded such as Sydney or Seoul. So, by heightening the number of residents in one town, not only it would not help to reduce the traffic, but also the adverse effects will be intensified.
In conclusion, although it may seem productive if most of the citizens were living in inner cities because there would be fewer commuters between cities, it has resulted in even worse circumstances.
- In some places young people find it difficult to communicate with older people Why is this What are the solutions 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- In many countries people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops Why do you think people waste food in this way What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away 82
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplaces Others think that the true function of a university should be to given access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the cours 73
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10283687943 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86591743115 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7176728565 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186600947874 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671596625825 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487983341937 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104550150633 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033200649925 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.