The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society do you think that advantage outweigh the disadvantage?
With the advent of technology, the majority of people are virtually connected through social media as compared to earlier times, when people usually preferred to have a face to face interaction. Although, it leads to a sedentary lifestyle, it is economical and saves a lot of time. Therefore, I believe that the advantage outweigh the disadvantage, which is discussed further in this essay.
To begin with, the use of social media has changed the lives of many people in a positive way by considering the current scenario, where people are avoiding meeting each other during pandemic crisis. So, in order to stay connected with their colleagues, family, friends and relatives, everyone is dependent on these networking websites. Additionally, meeting in person is time-consuming and expensive. For instance, in order to connect with a client, a sales person has to plan his calendar and incur exorbitant expenses which are inevitable. However, doing a meeting online or virtually on Skype could save a lot of money and time for both of them.
On the contrary, the primary drawback is that people who are excessively on social media are facing health issues because of their sedentary lifestyle. Moreover, by not meeting their acquaintances, they are losing their social life as well as facing trouble in their physical and mental development. For instance, these days a plethora of people working from home, are more likely to face stress, anxiety and depression. So, in order to restrain this, people should start going out and have face to face interaction more often.
In the end, people are more comfortable by not going out and using social media for communicating with each other, since it is low cost and conserve travel time. Thus, we can clearly say that the advantage outweighs the disadvantage, but one should not forget its well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-14 | sarab.sarna@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | sarab.sarna@gmail.com | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ia has changed the lives of many people in a positive way by considering the current scenario, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13531353135 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84737969951 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8320097032 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28814356631 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089071105315 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766913542151 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172171483662 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611084786255 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.