The above line graph illustrates the population of four various species turtles in India, over the period of 32 years.
To begin with the Leatherback turtles, the population in 1980 is about 100 in number over a period of 1985 the population gradually increasing. However, the population of Leatherback turtles significantly plummeted to 2012. In contrast, the Oliver turtles significantly surge upwards at 1998. From 1998, this species fluctuated over period of 12 years and the population is about 130 in 2012.
Moreover, the green turtle population fluctuated up to 1990, after the population gradually diminished to 90 in 2012. Finally, the overall population of turtles maintained constantly. The population remains constant from 1980 to 2012 about 100 in number.
Overall, the population of turtles other than green turtles are equal in number in 1986. In 1986, the two species, one is Oliver turtles considerably increased up to 2012 and another species Leatherback gradually diminished up to 2012. The Oliver population is the highest in 2012 comparatively, the Leatherback population is the lowest in 2012.
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sales Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo Japan listened to music over the previous month The pie chart shows a record company s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music Summarize the information by selecting and 11
- The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago Furthermore there has been 68
- The diagram shows the stages in the cultivation and management of a forest Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features And make comparisons where relevant 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40571428571 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06157755787 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462857142857 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6235017918 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212340155818 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10405508655 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327363185899 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150141923263 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204212585305 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.