Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whether governments should invest more money in support of the arts than in support of sports can be weighed in many aspects. However, not all locations are the same.
Admittedly, the author's claim may appear to have considerable merits. In certain areas, investing in arts rather than sports does have much more positive impacts. Take Italy as an example. During the Renaissance, Italy was the abode of numerous talented artists. Their legacies help bolster the local economy, tens of thousands of tourists come from every place on earth just to appreciate their artworks. Therefore, the Italian government should spend more money in support of preserving the advantages that create the prosperity of Italy.
However, not every place is the same. When we speak of governments, the following come to mind: governments in the area that sports activities prevail and governments in the area where arts flourish. Obviously, the latter should invest more in support of the arts, while others may not.
It is thus justifiable to take both kinds of governments into account, and we will find the statement problematic. Consider a nation that features itself with a certain kind of sports, if their government gives up their advantages or traditions and alternatively spends money in such field their societies are not familiar with, the originally burgeoning sports industry may collapse, and no one can guarantee whether will they succeed in the newly invested arts field, which will possibly lead to some degree of economical depression. For instance, the Republic of Cuba, which is famous for outputting talented baseball players, if they suddenly shift the aid from training baseball player into a certain field of arts, not only will the baseball world lose a bunch of fresh arms and bats, but also will their economy suffer.
In summary, the statement is not as persuasive as it stands. Although in some areas, aiding in artwork can buttress their economy, not every place is the same. If sport-flourished governments intentionally want to change funding or assistance into such a field they are not familiar with, the result may possibly backfire no matter how good the ambition or intention firstly is. According to my exposition, I fundamentally disagree with the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 77
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether governments should invest more money in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ch will possibly lead to some degree of economical depression. For instance, the Republic ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 301, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
... they are not familiar with, the result may possibly backfire no matter how good the ambitio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 301, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
... they are not familiar with, the result may possibly backfire no matter how good the ambitio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in summary, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22282608696 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79370558202 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551630434783 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.9936340482 48.9658058833 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215342554493 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673862620875 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884597243935 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14356597904 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748496720105 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.