A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights and the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
The social contract is the contract between every member of the society and the society. Any member of the society is expected to adhere to its rules and he earns his rights from this contract. This is why I argue that anyone who commits a crime, in most cases, should lose his civil rights, especially the right to benefit from his or her own labor. This stance is supported by the following two points:
Firstly, punishments serve as a deterrent to crime. For example, the existence of jail term as a form of punishment has been proven to reduce crimes in many countries of the world. This is because humans value their freedom, and the many other benefits that come with having it. A threat to this would discourage anyone from going ahead to break the law. Because humans are not naturally expected to conform to rules, the threat of punishment is an effective way of eliciting obedience. The denial of civil rights is a particularly potent tool in this regard.
Secondly, the denial of the right to benefit from their own labor is a way of repaying what they have taken from the society. For example, if a convict of theft spends some jail term doing free labour, he inadvertently pays the society back for what he/she has denied it. This form of punishment also makes criminals understand the dignity in labour and be encouraged to work on their own after regaining freedom. This is a win-win situation for both society and criminal elements.
However, I believe some rights are sacrosanct and shouldn't be violated even in the treatment of criminals. Similarly, not all crimes should warrant the suspect forfeiting his rights. For example, citizens shouldn't be denied of their right to freedom from torture for any reason. Also, for little offences such as jumping the traffic lights, it would be extreme to deny a person his right to benefit from his own labor as a consequence of su.
In conclusion, deliberately breaking the social contract by committing crimes, should be met with a denial of rights from the citizen, because he has failed to earn his rights by committing a crime. Therefore, a person who commits a crime should not retain any civil rights, especially the right to benefit from his/her own labour.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-18 | Mubarakbabs | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 66
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 70
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous exper 68
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 55
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights and the right to benefit from his or her own labor Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... believe some rights are sacrosanct and shouldnt be violated even in the treatment of cr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...iting his rights. For example, citizens shouldnt be denied of their right to freedom fro...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81558441558 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54947204824 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.185983099 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.5789473684 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315046152174 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10825409585 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113520732292 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211621812642 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133720771657 0.0667264976115 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... believe some rights are sacrosanct and shouldnt be violated even in the treatment of cr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...iting his rights. For example, citizens shouldnt be denied of their right to freedom fro...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81558441558 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54947204824 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.185983099 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.5789473684 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315046152174 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10825409585 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113520732292 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211621812642 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133720771657 0.0667264976115 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.