Clothing and other things are made by famous brands have a reputable market, since more people and people want to have these items. Why is this?
Is this a positive or negative development?
In sophisticated era, people rely on purchasing items being have luxurious types as the popular brands have high reputable in environment. People’s life has changed the way people buy branded-cloths categorized are pricey after those are released in market, addressing positive impact for people because of increasing high quality in environment and making social gap in negative side.
People tend to purchase clothes as those are made by renowned brands which people prefer to make popularity themselves. Why this is happened? People believe having high-quality product contribute greater social acceptance so that they make an interaction people with different economic level. Thus, if people can make social groups they will have many relationships, leading to broaden social networking. For example, based on Brawijaya University research had revealed that there is sociality group created by people from different level called “Girls Squad”, and they consist of 12 people buying clothes’ within price almost a million dollars a day, so they also build a small business related on reputable wearable things in order to save financial for the future.
Modern lifestyle brings people whom buy branded-items create social gap in different level of economic. This is because people consider there is different level of wealth, and they feel having high position in social, leading to criminal activities. For Instance, based on observation on Indonesian’s people living within expensive items in 20th centuries, had shown they tend to show their jewelry in their lifestyles, resulting to insult and to be arrogant toward the poor, and 20% of people conduct bullying in school. However, if people purchasing branded-goods are utilized to create business, those result in raising income for people and do not waste money more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-21 | Hestivivin | 56 | view |
- Destination and employment in UK 73
- The graph below shows the percentage change in place where students lived over five decade 61
- The lifecyle of salmon by estuary
- The map shows about the improvement in different area 84
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52482269504 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83124440344 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624113475177 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.9776105415 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351779796004 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158974571142 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536762719007 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265447853817 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034601333755 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.