dinosaurs
The author in the reading believes that dinosaurs were endotherm and as a result, they can maintain their body temperature constantly. The lecturer, however, finds this statement dubious and casts doubt on it by asserting that these reasons can't prove for these animals to be endotherms.
First of all, the author believes that dinosaurs used to live in polar cold atmospheres according to the fossils which were explored there. The lecturer rebuts this by saying that polar areas used to have warmer temperatures than today and whenever the weather converted to cold climate dinosaurs started immigrating to warm areas or they tried to hibernate.
Secondly, the author suggests that though to the legs of dinosaurs that were positioned underneath of their body they are counted as endotherms. He asserts that this position leads to running and quicker moves ability for them. The lecturer challenges this by arguing that the position of their legs doesn’t relate to the movement but was positioned to let them grow higher.
Finally, the author contends that their bones structure entailed Haversian canals that had nerves and blood vessels that rendered to quicker growth, and these canals included in dinosaurs fossils which indicated they are endotherms. In contrast, the lecturer holds the view that dinosaurs had growth rings in their fossils which let their bones become thickened and consolidated. Besides, these rings used to work whenever dinosaurs ceased growing or had slow growth of body structure in cold environments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | saamaan | 86 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | joeyrussell007 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | tststs | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | nusybah | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t on it by asserting that these reasons cant prove for these animals to be endotherm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61765921165 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534979423868 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1593245814 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258297261219 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119037325049 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080071520522 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160175815486 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545882145529 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.