Chaco
The reading states that there are three different theories about the usage of Chaco Canyon in Mexico city. The lecturer, however, finds these theories dubious and he believes that they are not convincing.
First of all, the author asserts that Chaco used to be a house for the residential of so many people. He states that the building was so large that it could contain many individuals in it. The lecturer challenges this by suggesting that the outside of the building seemed to be a place for native American's living, while the inside casts doubt whether it could be appropriate for living or not. He believes that there were few fireplaces as many as ten to be suitable for so many families. Besides, the building needed about a hundred rooms to accommodate family members.
Secondly, the author contends that they could use Chaco Canyon as a place to store their food in order not to make them corrupted. He suggests that they conserved maize for a long period of time. The lecturer debuts this statement by saying that there should be bulky maize containers in order to maintain them. In addition, there is evidence of maize spill on the ground which dismisses that it was a proper place for food storage.
Finally, the reading asserts that they used to take so many ceremonies in the Chaco building, and also they served meals and as a result, there were scatters of pots on the ground that counted as a clue. In contrast, the lecturer holds the view that there was evidence of other materials such as sands, stones, construction stuff, and trashes used to build the house. He believes that the broken parts of the pot were related to the meal of workers who built the house.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ts that they conserved maize for a long period of time. The lecturer debuts this statement by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7027027027 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40134032454 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510135135135 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4125584817 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138690703798 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534389968898 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857190216685 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976211493101 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317379162413 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.