Some people choose to work at one job for a long time. Others prefer to change jobs frequently. Which way do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your choice.
In general, people prefer to choose to work at one job for a long time because they want to have a stable career. However, I would rather experience a swap job frequently as I can expand network with many people, I become more active, flexible and I have a lot of energetic.
Firstly, if I change my job frequently, I can expand the network. I have more relationships with my friends and coworkers, bosses, and partners from a different company. Otherwise, if I only stay in one company, I am only able to know coworkers in my office. Additionally, when I have more helps or when I find a job, I will ask my coworkers or friends from a much different company, they will recommend and give me advice helpful.
Secondly, people will become more active and flexible when they change jobs frequently. It is really necessary because they have to adapt to a lot of problems and find the solution to handle it that makes them gain more knowledge and enhance new skills such as problem-solving, time management, and so on. In contrast, people who work only one company for a long-time are very boring because they only do many things repeat. It’s very safe. Job swapping frequently help people become more active and flexible, It would be crucial to develop their career in the future.
Lastly, job swapping makes people more energetic at work. if people only engage with one company they don’t have the motivation to work and then their performance is very low and they feel boring. Inconstancy, people who frequently change their job will more energetic because people can be more creative and more responsible for those jobs. By having lots of energy, people who regularly swap jobs will get more high performance.
In conclusion, changing jobs or staying jobs is better depends on the view of each person. For me, a girl who likes to challenge myself all the time would rather jobs frequently because it help me expand network with many people, I become more active, flexible and I have a lot of energetic.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-12-25 | sarahzalkifal | 84 | view |
2020-10-23 | Pham Thuy Thuy Tien | 44 | view |
- MANAGING A TEAM CAN BE A VERY DIFFICULT JOB IN YOUR OPINION WHAT QUALITIES MAKE A GOOD BOSS USE REASONS AND EXAMPLE TO SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER 78
- In a company sometimes employees refuse to be promoted In which situations shouls employees be able to refuse a promotion Use specific reasons and examples to explain your choice 73
- Some companies push employees to retire after they pass middle age Others allow employees to stay untill they want to retire Use specific reasons and examples to explain your choice 71
- MOST PEOPLE WOULD PREFER TO WORK FOR THEMSELVES RATHER THAN SOMEONE ELSE DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT USE SPECIFIC REASONS AND DETAILS TO EXPLAIN YOUR OPINION 84
- Some people choose to work at one job for a long time Others prefer to change jobs frequently Which way do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to explain your choice 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ng makes people more energetic at work. if people only engage with one company the...
^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'job'
Suggestion: job
...llenge myself all the time would rather jobs frequently because it help me expand ne...
^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...would rather jobs frequently because it help me expand network with many people, I b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in contrast, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72934472934 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66494331535 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470085470085 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2631139389 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6470588235 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242305141306 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101826578654 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082004055886 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168126595357 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613383300075 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.