Nowadays, it is widely argued by some that there is no point at trying to mitigate global warming, and that it would be better if people started to come to terms with it. Speaking for myself, I absolutely disagree with this statement for the below mentioned reasons.
First of all, I believe that our planet has not yet reached the point beyond non repair in terms of climate change. Therefore, there are still measures that governments, individuals and the general public can take, in order to put a stop to global warming. More specifically, governments can introduce “green legislation” provisions by imposing extra taxes to airline companies, drivers and other air-polluters, and at the same time by introducing tax exemptions regarding companies that invest in renewable energy, such as wind farms business entities. Moreover, individuals should use their cars less and choose to move from one place to the other by public transport or bike. Finally, the general public can request from the political parties to include to their respective agenda measures pertaining to the protection of the environment.
In addition, the belief that we can accept global warming and start to live with it is, in my opinion, a hazardous approach, because of its potentially harmful to the environment consequences. To give one example, I am not optimistic that our planet can bear for much longer the gradual rise of sea level. In some countries, such as Holland, flooding of large parts of the country is an imminent threat, which could lead to the destruction of thousands of people’s houses, and subsequently to their migration to other more promising countries. If this prediction comes to fruition, hundreds of thousands of people will face during the next twenty years poverty and homelessness.
In conclusion, I totally disagree that it would be a good idea to find ways to live with global warming due to the fact that there are still methods to mitigate the danger and the potential consequences of this approach would have catastrophic consequences for the environment.
- In 1930 75 of the labour force in the USA was employed in farming fishing and foresting whileonly 10 worked in sales and office and trade At the same time both the Industrial sector and thetechnical sector constituted just 2 of the workforce each T
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 47
- Some People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s that governments, individuals and the general public can take, in order to put a stop to glo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 692, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... public transport or bike. Finally, the general public can request from the political parties ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13569321534 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93576281111 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59587020649 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5178700482 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.083333333 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105788845731 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033997756529 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348386597082 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685329776502 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033260847045 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.