The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant has been deleted.
The manifested chart illustrates the results of an inquiry regarding the tendency of people in five different Australian cities for the consumption and purchasing of two sorts of beverages, i.e. tea and coffee, in four weeks.
As can be seen, in most of the cities, denizen incline to go to café is considerably more than buying fresh and instant coffee, and amongst these cities, e.g. Melbourn and Hobart have the highest percentage (just above 62%), while the people of Adelaide demonstrates the lowest predilection (well less than 50%).
As far as purchasing fresh coffee, residents have a low penchant for purchase of this product, which Brisbane has minimum tendency among all cities, in comparison to that of instant coffee over the cities, which Brisbane and Hobart have the maximum predilection, i.e. more than 50%.
In conclusion, it can be found that people like going to coffee for drinking coffee and tea in lieu of buying and drinking them in another place. Moreover, citizens would like instant coffee than a fresh one.
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
- The Graph shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
- Some people say there is no need for print newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d like instant coffee than a fresh one.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., if, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09356725146 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64903889466 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.7669543391 43.030603864 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.2 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 5.23603664747 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145445875255 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873403764423 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679798337672 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946986011867 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638755502544 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.