The article states that the problems in the painting suggest that it could not be a work by Rembrant and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor in the lecture explains that the painting belongs to Rembrant and provides three reasons of support to refute each of the reading reason.
The article states that the problems in the painting suggest that it could not be a work by Rembrant and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor in the lecture explains that the painting belongs to Rembrant and provides three reasons of support to refute each of the reading reason.
First, the reading states that Rembrant always pay attention to details in his subject and would not be guilty of such inconsistency. The Professor opposese this by explaining that the xtray analysics makes it knownn that such inconsistency was not part of the initial painting, explaining further that this might have been added later to beautify the painting.
Second, the reading claims that he was a master of painting light and shadow and there is no way he would have made such an error. However, the Professor refutes this by saying the original light and shadow are realistic and it reveals the woman in the painting is wearing a single light colour and this makes the Professor to states that the painting truly belongs to Rembrant.
Third, the reading posit that Rembrant often painted on wood panels, there is no painting known of him to be of panel glued together. In constrst, the Professor states that the original painting was painted on a single wood just like Rembrant would paint it. The professor explains further that a piece of wood might have been added later just to be it more beatiful after the the original painting by Rembrant.
- No one can deny that there are negative and positive aspect of comparing the comfortability of life in the olden days to the nowadays life If i were to choose i would definitely agree that it is more comfortable to live now than the time of our grandparen 73
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree 70
- One can deny there are positive and negative aspect of this prompt If i were to choose i would strongly agree that it is more important to keep old frields than new friends for a number of reasons that i will develop in the subsequent paragraphs 70
- However in the lecture the man disagree with this develpoment and provides three reasons to refutes each of the reading reason 60
- No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects to children playing computer games Some will argue that because playing computer games enhances the intellectual capacity of the children and due to this it be allowed However If i were to 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...later just to be it more beatiful after the the original painting by Rembrant.
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...later just to be it more beatiful after the the original painting by Rembrant.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86345381526 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43928218521 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441767068273 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.445026174 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.555555556 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499570885124 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256780517349 0.0996497079465 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.23989783767 0.0662205650399 362% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341749038277 0.162205337803 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.296205240916 0.0443174109184 668% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.