The maps below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The rendered diagram depicts the information pertaining the evolution of a small fishing village into a European resort for tourism purposes from 1974 to 2004.
At a fleeting glance, it is vivid that the original village had been in same place since 1974 but extended with the homes behind it. Moreover, sea shore area where boats and fishing had taken place was converted into beach and surrounded by number of hotels. Woodland was demolished during development and converted into golf course.
Moving further, numerous of tourist shops opened up in the village on left side of mountains. Olives filed was replaced by farmland where fruits and vegetables were grown for hotels. Meanwhile, a road was constructed which was passed through the village that was situated on right of mountain. In 2004 the population had skyrocketed to 80,000 resorts with 50,00tourist beds.
Overall, the local village remained located at same place although surrounding the houses suffered remarkable modifications and became tourist spot.
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 73
- While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualification and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and relevant examples 56
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 11
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39751552795 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68328732398 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683229813665 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8345643068 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204820607428 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772200601642 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548018617125 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123304612521 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527971526464 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.