Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Museums and monuments tell about the life of ancient people. People visit such places in their country and even other countries to know about the lifestyle of individuals of different countries in the past. However, it is evident that local people are not thrilled to go to historical sites that are nearby to their homes. The expensive tickets could be a main reason, which stops localites to explore the museums.
In many countries, people scarcely have a good income which is enough only for their survival. Some people are not enough affluent that they can spend money on other activites apart from spending on intrinsic things. Moreover, the price of tickets of museums is so high that discourages their willing to see any historical place. For example, the Indian government charges 100 rupees from local public to grant access to the Taj Mahal that is half of many people’s every day wage. Therefore, the locals tend to not visit such museums and historical sites.
Governments can make the ticket price available to the local population at a reasonable price. States charge a high price from international tourists to buy a ticket that may be sufficient for the maintenance of monuments and museums. So, if governments start to charge a less amount from the locals that would encourage them to visit such places. To illustrate, arts and science museum in Tokyo sells its tickets at a low price to Japanese population that encourages the locals to explore the museum. Consequently, governments can decrease the price of tickets for the local people to increase the visit of localites in the museums and historical places.
To conclude, countries should take a decent amount from the locals to allow them to enter museums and historical sites. Nations can use the money collected from high taxes on goods, and expensive education to maintain such places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | _thatfrostbyte_ | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones 78
- Write a letter to the manager about your stay In your letter Give details of your stay What were the high low points of the hotel What are your suggestions recommendations and or complaints about the hotel Write at least 150 words You do NOT need to write 81
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity Do you think eating together is important to people in your country 56
- Far too little has been done to prevent animals and plants from dying out although people have been aware of this problem for a long time Why do people do so little about it Give your suggestions on how to solve this problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e maintenance of monuments and museums. So, if governments start to charge a less amou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03870967742 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62494239568 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503225806452 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.375856151 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323240194591 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112212217569 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712200255837 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195662049075 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598130078596 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.