Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is argued that museums and places of historical significance are primarily attended by tourists as opposed to the locals. This essay aims to examine the causes that account for this phenomenon and provide several feasible solutions to encourage the locals’ attendance to these places.
There are several compelling reasons as to why more foreign visitors than the locals pay more visits to museums and history-related places. First and foremost, as visitors voyage to far-flung destinations with a giant chasm in culture from their native countries, they often have a sense of curiosity about the local history. Thus, they feel a strong incentive to discover these locations. It is true that foreigners really incline to gain insights into the destination country, via visiting war relics and historical places, while the locals are well-acquainted with the history of their cities. The second justification is that foreigners are more willing to pay the admission fees. To be more precise, many well-known historical sites do not come cheap and require a substantial amount of entrance fee, which is more affordable for visitors from other countries than some underprivileged locals in developing nations.
In order to resurrect the interest of the local people in coming to these places, several workable actions could be adopted. One approach is to organize varied hands-on activities, which may incorporate art performances in order to arouse the curiosity of the native citizens. Organizers should invite prominent figures to increase the coverage of such events. Through these forms of active activities, people’s awareness about preserving the cultural heritages will be raised and cultivate their altruism. Besides, the local authorities should give the visit gratis or put in effect subsidies for the entrance fee to local residents. As a result, they will feel less burdened by their financial strain and can afford a visit to these sites.
In conclusion, while the foreigners’ enthusiasm for museums and historical spots are apparent, proper measures can be adopted to awaken local inhabitants’ interest in those places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | _thatfrostbyte_ | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010 70
- Some people believe that it is possible for a country to be economically successful and have a clean environment Others argue that these two aims are not compatible Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, really, second, so, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48192771084 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94427364188 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58734939759 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0950708379 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354626053344 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103461947442 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651824886515 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191886545928 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325099207721 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.