It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do disadvantages of this development for society outweigh advantages?
In the last decade, many changes have arrived and the list of essentials has enormously expanded. Now, a car, a television and a fridge has become a want for people, and with that, the usage of such things has also increased. This essay would discuss the merits and demerits of such goods and tell whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages or not.
Nowadays, a car has become a significant part of life to commute from one place to another, and a television is the best medium of entertainment, and a refrigerator to keep the food fresh. People travel to office, shopping complex, gym and many other places, for which they need a car that also protects individuals from rain, dust, and the cold weather. Beside, people spend most time at home, so they look for possible options of entertainment, and many people prefer watching television, which is also beneficial for families as they would spend their time together. Moreover, a fridge is very necessary to protect food, such as vegetables and milk, so that it can be used when needed. Consequently, these goods have become a crucial part of people’s lives.
If such items are used more than a limit, they may cause severe consequences for everyone. Cars run on fossil fuels, such as petrol and diesel, which are not available at a reasonable price, and such cars also produce pollution, which may pose a serious threat to the environment. Furthermore, if people become addicted to watching television, they may not spend time with others or do some physical activities. As a result, it would effect not only their health but also the social life because of devoting most time of their day to the television. In addition, televisions and fridges consume much electricity; therefore, people would get higher electricity bill if such products are not used in a limit. For instance, people pay a higher electricity bill because they spend much time watching their favourite shows or matches on a television.
To conclude, although a car, a fridge, a television has many disadvantages. However, it becomes beneficial to possess such commodities by using them in a limit. So, the advantages of such items would definitely outweigh the disadvantages if they are not misued and used appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-02 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 67 | view |
| 2016-12-19 | ak007 | 80 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday Write a letter to your friend In your letter give contact details for when you are away give instructions on how to take care of your pet describe the other household duties 67
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn t waste their limited resources and spaces on providing expensive hi tech media such as computer software videos and DVDs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful Architects shouldn t worry about producing building as a work of art Do you agree or disagree 61
- Last month you travelled to another city You told a friend who lives in the city that you would meet them but you did not Write a letter to this friend In your letter apologise for not meeting him her explain why you did not contact him her earlier sugges 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...sical activities. As a result, it would effect not only their health but also the soci...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00530503979 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90139362706 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519893899204 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9749056232 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189717324167 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654546379859 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530463961824 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142757229334 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737244436219 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.