In recent years, the family structure and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative?
In the last few decades, many changes have arrived in family structures that has resulted a change in the roles of its members. A whole family was living together in one big house in the past; however, very few families are living with their uncle and aunt’s family today. Various changes can take place that would have some positives and negatives on individuals and societies.
People are moving out from their joint families, and live a seperate and independent life. Earlier, a whole family was sharing the same house, staying closely connected with each other. Nevertheless, people are preferring to live only with their family which includes parents and children because of some reasons, such as, jobs, or to maintain their personal life. Consequently, a family would not see and interact with other family members frequently, and they would know less about each other in the future. For example, families sometimes forget names of other children in their family because they rarely get to talk to each other.
The change in family structure have some benefits and flaws that would effect individuals and societies both. Scarcity of communication would weaken the bond of family members. Some families might take an important decision individually that may cause a severe consequence, in which no one would be able to help. Moreover, the youth generation would never consider living in a joint family in the future because of the changes in the present. On the other hand, personal life of family and its members would be maintained, and one would become responsible for their family, thus would be an effective decisive in every situation. People would be excited to meet their relatives, whom they have not met for a long time.
To conclude, although changes are taking place rapidly that have many positive and negatives for everyone, family is of utmost importance for a person; therefore, necessary steps should be taken to sustain the traditional joint-family culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-27 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-27 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
- Today the advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists such as musicians painters and writers are still highly valued What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 78
- Some people believe that only experienced people should be promoted for the higher position in an organization Discuss your opinion 61
- Write about the following topic Do you think extra curricular activities are important in a student s life Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 11
- The government should not waste money on arts as this money would be better spent on other projects like sanitation or infrastructure Do you agree with the above statement 67
- Nowadays parents are allowing their children to use tablets and smartphones to enhance learning Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d with each other. Nevertheless, people are preferring to live only with their family which in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...have some benefits and flaws that would effect individuals and societies both. Scarcit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14814814815 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59391500665 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.610396314 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200661641899 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866959815643 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874678379381 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153603490897 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889694263195 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.