Professor:Setting up a permanent station on Venus may not be without challenges, but it is certainly possible. One solution that's been proposed is to establish a station that would be floating in Venus's atmosphere, like a balloon, rather than standing on its surface. The station would float about 50 kilometers above Venus's surface. On a station located high in the atmosphere, the problems the reading mentions can be solved.First, atmospheric pressure. Well, it is a well-known physical fact that high up in the atmosphere, the pressure is much lower than at the surface. So while the pressure at Venus's surface is too high for humans, 50 kilometers up in the atmosphere, the pressure's equal to the normal pressure we're used to here on Earth. There would be no danger of the station getting crushed.Second, water and oxygen. Well, as you read, Venus's atmosphere contains compounds such as carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. There are chemical processes that could be used on the station to make water and oxygen out of these compounds. So the water and oxygen necessary for human survival could be produced using chemical materials that can be easily obtained from Venus's atmosphere. It would not be necessary to import them.Third, the light blocking clouds. Well, it is true that there are still clouds 50 kilometers above Venus's surface. However, clouds above that level are not very thick, so there would be a considerable amount of sunlight filtering through. Moreover, at you read, the clouds reflect sunlight. The station can make use of this reflected light too. In other words, its solar-powered cells could collect both the direct sunlight filtering from above and the sunlight reflected by the clouds below. More than enough electricity could be generated this way to power the station.
According to the reading passage, some scientists are seeking to find a place in which they could build permanent stations for humans other than earth, and it seems that other planets like Venus are so extreme and inhospitable for the living of humans. However, the professor asserts that building a permanent station would be without challenge but it certainly possible. Building a floating station, like a balloon, 50 km above Venus atmosphere could be a good solution.
First, the author states that Venus has got a 90-time atmospheric pressure greater than earth which human body or space crafts would be crushed. On the contrary, the professor underlies that 50 km above Venus atmosphere, it seems that there is no danger in such a height and the atmospheric pressure is resemble that of earth.
Moreover, Venus has got any proper resources of water and oxygen which are vital for human life and to build the pramanent station, we must transfer water from earth to Venus. In contrast, the professor argues that although Venus atmosphere contains a huge amount of Co2 and So2, by building the floating station above its atmosphere, we can convert these gases to water and oxygen, also not be necessary to import them from earth.
Finally, the cloud's thickness of Venus would reflect the sun lights, about 60 percent, back into space as well as underneath these thick clouds, there is a great deal of carbon dioxide, which ban even more light, then the surface cannot assimilate more lights. Consequently, permeant stations are not able to use solar power cells to generate the electricity for their machines and equipment. Conversely, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that building floating stations up in the 50 km height, clouds are not extremely too thick and the sunlight can pass through clouds and the station can use solar lights, and the power could be generated by solar power cells.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-02 | yasy.j728@gmail.com | 83 | view |
- Do you agree with the following statement In the past the young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 73
- Elephants are fascinating but the beliefs you just read about are based on misunderstandings of elephant behavior First we should not assume that old elephants are aware that they will die soon just because they break away from their herds There is a very 93
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement it is more important for government to spend money to improve internet access or improving public transportation 90
- ProfessorIt s perfectly possible that the nests found inside the fossilized trees were made by bees 200 million years ago The arguments used by the skeptics are not convincing First it s true we have no fossil remains of actual bees that date to 200 milli 80
- Professor There should definitely be stricter rules adopted for handling and disposing of coal ash First the regulations we have now for example those that require companies to use liner are not really sufficient Under the current regulations liner has to 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'resembled'.
Suggestion: resembled
... height and the atmospheric pressure is resemble that of earth. Moreover, Venus has got...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'clouds'' or 'cloud's'?
Suggestion: clouds'; cloud's
...o import them from earth. Finally, the clouds thickness of Venus would reflect the su...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, in contrast, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97507788162 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52415279406 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3132956705 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.7 110.228320801 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1 21.698381199 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2 7.06452816374 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327876787489 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150395713335 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949674701359 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204196424352 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904435490618 0.0443174109184 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.