The graph shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
The given line graph illustrates the number of pollutants(in million tonnes) that are discharged from Industry, Transport, and household activities in the UK over a period of 15 years from 1990 to 2005.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the total pollution has undergone a dramatic fall. Furthermore, despite being the highest contributor, industrial pollution observed a major plunge over the others over time.
To begin with, the total pollution plummeted from a peak value of 7 million tonnes to only 4 million tonnes in 1999 before reaching a plateau until 2001. After that, the pattern experienced a further decline, with just above 3 million tonnes in 2005.
Turning to the sources, Industry reported nearly 5.7 million tonnes of pollutants as compared to just a fifth of that from the other two resources. However, with the passing years, whilst industry and household saw a substantial dip in 1995 prior to slacking off drastically at 2 and 0.2 million tonnes, by contrast, besides a few fluctuations, the household pollutants leveled off at 1 million tonnes over the given period length.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010 84
- The users of social media such as Facebook and Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some feel that it is a waste of time to plan for the future and it is more important to focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below shows the results of a 25 year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26984126984 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85179786149 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608465608466 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7845911839 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.285714286 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173929752781 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883658094716 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688828994285 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119224144924 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743730072324 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.