In the present era, children are found to have fewer responsibilities than it used to be in the past time. Some people consider it as positive development, however, some other people believe it to be a negative trend
Being responsible has long been regarded as the precursor of children’s development. In contemporary society, younger people are considered to take fewer responsibilities than they were in the past. While this trend could bring more benefits to children, I would argue that it is more likely to have detrimental effect.
On the one hand, it is widely believed that taking fewer responsibility is beneficial for children in many ways. Firstly, younger generation may have a memorable childhood if they have fewer tasks to do. There is no doubt that some tasks require hours to complete such as preparing the meals or looking after pets, which curtails their relaxing time. Instead of doing these mundane duties, children could make friends with their peers or watch their favourite programs. That make them feel free from any kind of tension in their childhood. Secondly, children are able to preparing about their future better when shouldering less responsibility. For instance, individuals whose dreams are become an artist, could invest more time in drawing and painting since they were young as long as they were given less work to do.
On the other hand, I would argue that these benefit are eclipsed by the drawbacks. The most important advantage of letting children work is that it facilitates children’s cognitive and physical development. When working, children are trained from their parents and from these tasks they have done, they could learn many things about the world. As a result, children could self- develop better based on what they achieved through doing these tasks. Secondly, children will become more independent and versatile when they grow up. With many tasks such as cleaning the house or preparing the meals, which are almost essential for their latter life, children are able to take care themselves when they are adults.
In conclusion, while some people believe that children should be taken lesser responsibilities to have a happier childhood, I am convinced that children should do some work on their own. If regulated properly, these duties are effective for young people to become more self-sufficient.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 73
- In many schools and universities girls tend to choose arts subjects eg languages and boys choose science subjects eg Physics What do you think are the reasons Do you think that this tendency should be changed 61
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- the chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...many tasks such as cleaning the house or preparing the meals, which are almost es...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24127906977 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75483098699 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549418604651 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9418984315 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.166666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225904949217 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752469843978 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074700345261 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174675731992 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876609540774 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.