Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The extended family (grandparents, cousins,...) are a part of a family. In some families, grandparents, cousins, aunts have a basic role for other members which may this role be colorless for other families. Moreover, the role and importance of the extended family have changed over time. Personally speaking, I think the extended family is less important today than it was in the past. I have mentioned some reasons and my experiences to defend my opinion below.
All members of a family including the extended family or the close members such as parents, sisters, brothers were living together in the past. They lived in one house or their house was near to each other. Now, all members live separately and Some of them live in another city or even another country, so they can not have an influence on each other. As a result, they are less important than it was in the past. For example, my father and his parents had been living with his extended family in a big house when he was young. He worked with his cousins and uncles in a shop, so they were close to each other. Today, I, my parents, and my siblings live in a small house. I have not even seen some of my cousins because they live in a far city and have not enough time to come to their hometown or maybe they do not care about their extended family.
Another reason that I think needs to be mentioned is that living today is more complex than living in the past. People were living simply in a house and working on a farm or a shop, and life was passing happily. Today, people need to work hard and learn a profession for a career to be able to live properly. They can not spend much time with their family.
To sum up, I think the extended family has lost its importance now than it was in the past.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 3
- tpo 46 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The "let it burn" policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...he extended family grandparents, cousins,... are a part of a family. In some famil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, for example, i think, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38719512195 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33632685761 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448170731707 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1479841939 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7368421053 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207198590779 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836497796954 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840217315842 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158366679426 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679981015332 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 11.7677419355 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.