The line graph illustrates the several activities through which senior citizens in America spent their leisure time from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that hiking was the most popular activity during the period. We can also see that the proportion of internet surfers increased throughout the period.
To begin, in the 1980s, elderly people who surfed the Internet was only around 5%.also about 20% of the people were interested in hiking and only less than a third were into reading. The figures for individuals who preferred cinema was around 50%, whereas, three-fifths of the people preferred watching TV.
In the 1990s, the proportion of hiking and reading rose to 40%, but by the end of the period the figures for hiking increased to 80%, while reading only rose to 60%. Compared to the past, in the 2010s the percentage of elderly people who went to cinema declined to 45%,whereas the amount of Internet surfers increased to 50%. Finally, those who watched TV was around 65%.
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- some people think that family has the most important influence on children s development while others believe that factored such as TV friends music and books have more significant impact discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at lea 11
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 66
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45630753612 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577380952381 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0028408174 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896449154847 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384801504428 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556003084805 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645190830614 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655983638257 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.