Creating a suitable educational environment has drawn much public attention over the past few decades. It is said that separating two genders is the best, whereas others hold the belief that the practice of teaching boys and girls in the same school brings about more advantages. This essay shall examine both sides of this debate in detail before giving my opinion.
On the one hand, supporters of the single-sex schooling system believe that it has numerous following merits. First of all, boys and girls are naturally different, so they need a separate teaching method. As a result, the curriculum should be tailored to meet the needs and characters of each sex. Moreover, pupils will better concentrate on the tutorials in the class to stay clear of misconducts and even achieve higher graders.
On the other hand, opponents of the unisex school claim that coeducation reaps more bounties. Firstly, maintaining this system would be less costly. Clearly, to divide girls and boys, governments have to spend more money on education than teaching them in the same school. Secondly, it is a chance for both students to be in an environment that mirrors the real world. Therefore, they are able to understand the other's sex perspectives and be more confident in expressing their views in the presence of his/her classmates. Lastly, every gender has their own abilities in some specific aspects, so studying in this practice of teaching helps them support each other to reach their best achievements.
In a nutshell, despite some certain benefits of teaching boys and girls separately, I am convinced that educating in a mixed school is more beneficial for both genders and for teachers and governments as well. Therefore, it is hoped that the trend of coeducation schools will continue to be the norm over the world.
- Some say that advertisements of toys and snacks have a huge impact on children and their parents and therefore advertising to children should be banned Do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below illustrates the percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university between 2000 and 2010. 84
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 The amount spent on various foodstuffs in Italy millions of euros 1992 2002 2012 Beef 45 43 54 Chicken 38 41 56 Butter margarine 8 9 8 Potatoes 11 14 18 64
- Proportional Government Spending on Arts in 1995 and 2005 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7352249552 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2655628988 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311826791373 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882934532029 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769692902795 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187322233662 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457067092028 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.