There is an argument whether country government should use huge amount of money on building railway lines for rapid trains or use them on upgrading current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter that it is best to spend the money to improve current public transportation.
On the one side, building railway lines for rapid trains is great because it will make more rapid trains to operate. The more rapid trains that are operating, the bigger the chance for traffic congestion to be overcome. This is because rapid trains has special railway lines where only rapid trains are allowed to pass. Moreover, because of its speed, it will enable its passengers to cut their time needed to transport from one place to other places.
On the other side, upgrading current public transportation such as MRT and bus is also advantageous because it will make them more comfortable to ride. If the public transportation becomes more enjoyable for citizens to ride, they will choose to ride public transportation over their personal transportation, which will lead to the decrease of traffic congestion. Additionally, public transportation has affordable fare which make it has high possibility in making citizens willing to switch from their private vehicles. Thus, the chance for it to overcome traffic congestion is also high.
In conclusion, both building railway lines and upgrading existing public transportation are good choice when a country government has huge amount of money as both of them will help reducing the traffic congestion problem. However, I completely agree with the latter option as it has higher chance in reducing traffic congestion problem because of its affordable fare, that will make public to more likely to switch from their personal transportation.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both the views and give o 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 71
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...ount of money as both of them will help reducing the traffic congestion problem. However...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30175438596 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92885581211 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456140350877 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2233898586 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.916666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208787014564 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917789494889 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576909140045 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144177848861 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487717138036 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.