The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste.
The images give information about the process of designing a modern and developed landfill for household waste in soil.
From an overall perspective, this is a man-made activity which has been carried out in natural environment utilizing not only drainage, but also composition of waste and liquid.
To build the mentioned field, one hole has been made into a large piece of natural rock in a specific form. To complete this field to be practical, one layer of clay as well as a synthetic cover have been surrounded this field as well as drainage pipes and a tank at the bottom.
In order to use this landfill, household waste has been placed inside of the field so that the waste-liquid could be stored. Finally, as field should be closed, one layer of clay has been located at the top. Also, there would be pipes to the right of the hole that has let gases get in or out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste 61
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 73
- The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste 67
- The charts below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56329113924 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50502619247 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8910841778 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183967738876 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103495630354 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184180305842 0.0843802449381 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165532467869 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217125667774 0.0819641961636 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.