Nowadays anyone can use a mobile phone to answer work and personal calls at any place or 7 days a week. Does it have more positive or negative effects on individuals and society?
In the modern fast-pacing world, people are able to be contacted by phone for almost 24 hours a day. While this tendency may cause exhaustion as well as other health issues, I am convinced that it mostly brings convenience to a person and unites a society.
On the one hand, answering calls anytime and anywhere may be a key factor of physical as well as psychological health problems. Firstly, it could result in severe exhaustion as being in contact around the clock means that an individual may be disturbed even during a vacation or at midnight. This may consequently lower one’s energy level due to lack of sleep or rest. Not only might this be a crucial element in developing tiredness, but also constant disturbance is likely to provoke depression or anxiety. For instance, Japanese workers are known for their workaholic attitude which is expressed in constant answering their phone or checking their mail. This mostly costs those workers their overall health and even might lead to suicides due to the lack of rest and the possibility to relax.
On the other hand, despite the drawbacks of being in touch through a phone nonstop, I do believe that it could help to react faster to any emergency and organize a big group of people. Regarding the former, having a smartphone gives the opportunity to contact a family member or a co-worker in case of any problem at home or workplace and find an urgent solution to it. Moreover, the possibility of being contacted immediately provides society with a key instrument of uniting people to tackle important social problems. For example, in 2013 in Ukraine, there was the so-called Dignity Revolution when a huge number of protestants were able to gather in less than 15 minutes just by making phone calls to each other. This helped them to defend themselves from being beaten by governmental enforcers and had a crucial effect on the whole revolutionary process.
To conclude, phone calls can be responded anytime these days. This may be a disturbing factor for one’s health and for a society in general, nevertheless, I may argue that it is highly important for reacting to any type of urgency as well as for uniting people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-10 | knebekajze | 78 | view |
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone cellphone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 82
- Behaviour and lifestyles vary from country to country Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more people give money as a gift rather than buy some items What is the reason for this Is it a negative or positive trend 81
- Nowadays anyone can use a mobile phone to answer work and personal calls at any place or 7 days a week Does it have more positive or negative effects on individuals and society 78
- An increasing number of people are choosing plastic surgery Why do people choose to change the way they look Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ience to a person and unites a society. On the one hand, answering calls anytime...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, in general, as well as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88978494624 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76180210604 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2521195465 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.266666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5333333333 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120295705077 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417589536453 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306365796312 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758244397272 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214412220875 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.