The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
(millions)
The supplied line graph depicts the comparison of international visitors traveling to various part of the world namely North America, Central and Eastern Europe, South-East Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and South America between 1990 and 2005. As is observed, the number of tourists to all the regions increased to different extent.
North America was on top of the list with approximately 70 millions visitors in 1990. The figure continued to accelerate moderately until reaching the peak of 90 in 2000, followed by a mild slide in the next 5 years. However, the case was slightly different for Central and Eastern Europe and South-East Asia. The former experienced an upsurge from precisely 30 millions to almost trebling its number, ending the period at the same place as North America. The latter had its figure increased moderately from 20 millions in 1900 to just under 50 in 2005.
Sub-saharan Africa and South America were joint-lowest at the beginning of the period and shared relatively similar patterns throughout the years. A tedious climb was seen in the number of travelers to both countries but South America remained the least visited one on the list.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | thomasneverseen | view | |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | view |
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant millions 57
- The line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant millions 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16315789474 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73253203127 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615789473684 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2548339959 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795153752565 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328627490496 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334846878798 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583675346414 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535466002834 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.